Researchers are advocating for a significant reform of Australia’s food labelling system, expressing concerns that the current confusion surrounding best-before and use-by dates contributes to substantial food waste, costing households approximately $2,500 annually.
A study conducted by RMIT University and Food Waste Australia revealed that consumers, often overwhelmed by the information on food packaging, hesitate to consume items they perceive as past their prime, leading them to discard food that may still be perfectly safe. Professor Simon Lockrey from End Food Waste Australia likened the abundance of information on packaging to a chaotic parking lot, with various data competing for attention.
Currently, Australia generates about 7.6 million tonnes of food waste each year, a staggering figure that highlights the need for action. Associate Professor Lukas Parker from RMIT noted that individuals are essentially “throwing away money” when they dispose of food unnecessarily. He suggested practical approaches to determine food freshness, such as using senses like smell and taste, or even a simple touch to assess quality.
The researchers are advocating for a new, standardised, colour-coded labelling system that provides consumers with clear visual instructions, aimed at reducing waste and enabling households to maximise their food resources. According to Lockrey, consumers need better tools to achieve optimal food outcomes.
In the interim, it’s crucial to note the differences between the labels: a “use by” date indicates when food is no longer safe to eat, while a “best before” date serves merely as a guideline for quality. This distinction is essential to help consumers make informed decisions about their food, thus minimising waste and saving money.
The proposed changes aim to clarify food labelling and empower consumers to better manage their food, ultimately addressing a significant source of waste and economic loss in Australian homes.