Comic artist Evie Hilliar is expressing her discontent with the recent trend of AI-generated art, particularly as it relates to distinctive styles like that of Studio Ghibli, pioneered by renowned Japanese creators. She feels “tired” and “helpless,” especially after discovering that her own digital comics have been turned into animations without her consent or credit.
Hilliar conveyed her frustration in a recent interview, noting that while many artists oppose the use of AI for imitating their styles, she feels the trend is unstoppable. She has experimented with AI to generate interpretations of her work and admits that it does a remarkable job of mimicking her art. However, what troubles her most is how these adaptations detract from her ability to gain recognition and secure paid work.
Experts in art law have pointed out the detrimental effects of AI-generated art on the Australian art community, highlighting issues related to copyright gaps and ethical dilemmas. Dr. Louise Buckingham, CEO of Arts Law Australia, has voiced concerns that artists’ livelihoods are compromised due to the availability of inexpensive AI-generated alternatives that resemble authentic works, as copyright does not protect styles or techniques.
While some artists, like Sydney’s Werner Bronkhorst, view AI as a valuable tool for creativity, he empathises with those whose hard work feels diluted by AI replication. He argues that if AI does not infringe on copyrights, he sees no issue with its use. However, he acknowledges that for many, seeing their life’s work replicated en masse can be distressing.
Legally, artists retain copyright over their original works, but the distinction becomes blurred when AI-generated images appear to replicate significant portions of existing art. The intricacies of copyright law mean that artists engaging in AI-generated work could inadvertently face consequences if a substantial part of another artwork is used without consent.
As the debate on AI’s role in the art world continues, the implications for creators remain complex and contentious. Some maintain that the potential for AI artwork to overshadow genuine creations is a growing concern, underscoring the need for clearer definitions and protections within the evolving artistic landscape.