The current debate surrounding the right to work from home, particularly in the public sector, could significantly influence voter behaviour in the upcoming federal election. Notably, voters such as Jordan Carroll, 25, who values workplace flexibility, are expressing their concerns. Although Carroll isn’t a federal employee, he emphasises the growing preference for flexible work arrangements across the board.
Carroll left his conventional 9-5 role at the Commonwealth Bank to establish his own business, The Launch Crew, driven by the insights gained during the COVID-19 pandemic. He believes that the perception of what employees expect from their careers is shifting. “People are realising that enjoyment of life doesn’t just come from money,” Carroll shared, alluding to the importance of work-life balance and social interactions that flexible working arrangements foster.
A recent survey by Rippling revealed that 42% of respondents would reconsider accepting a job that required full-time office attendance. Furthermore, over half prioritised family-friendly policies like flexible working hours over salary. Carroll, too, affirmed that he would opt for the ability to work from home rather than a higher paycheck, stating that the quality of life significantly diminishes without such options. He highlighted the financial benefits that come with remote work, such as reduced commuting costs and childcare expenses.
The discussion of work-from-home policies has been stirred up by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s initial proposal to mandate a return to office work for public servants. Carroll described this notion as a “kick in the teeth,” particularly highlighting how such policies might have adverse effects, especially on women in the workforce, as noted by Michele O’Neil, president of the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU). O’Neil pointed out that remote work has enabled many women to re-enter the job market over the past four years.
Despite Dutton’s retraction of his hardline stance on returning to in-person work, experts like Matt Loop from Rippling anticipate that this issue will remain at the forefront of electoral discussions. He believes that topics affecting daily life, like flexible work, can become pivotal in influencing voters, comparable to healthcare or economic policies. “Tough talk on WFH may resonate with some, but it overlooks the general opinion on employee flexibility,” Loop explained.
In conclusion, as public sentiment around the right to work from home grows increasingly significant, it appears poised to play a critical role in shaping electoral outcomes, reflecting broader societal changes towards workplace expectations and lifestyle choices.