Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has downplayed fears that his government’s efforts to end Chinese ownership of the Port of Darwin might provoke backlash from Beijing, just ahead of a crucial meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Albanese’s trip to China is centred on promoting tourism and trade while highlighting the restoration of stable bilateral relations. However, his campaign pledge to revoke the 99-year lease of the port to the Chinese company Landbridge has already raised eyebrows in China, alongside discussions around Australia’s position on Taiwan and Chinese military drills near Australian waters.
During a recent statement, Albanese expressed confidence that there would be no significant repercussions from this contentious issue. He reiterated the government’s clear intention to transfer the port into Australian hands, stating, “We’ve been orderly about it, and we will go through that process.” This strong stance comes despite concerns from some quarters regarding potential economic threats from China, particularly in relation to key Australian exports like iron ore.
International relations expert Professor James Curran dismissed the possibility of China employing economic coercion against Australia, referring to such notions as “laughable.” He noted that past attempts by China to exert economic pressure during the previous Morrison administration had predominantly backfired. According to Curran, all industries previously impacted by Chinese sanctions have now resumed their operations.
Curran also questioned the Australian government’s rationale for addressing the Port of Darwin lease, mentioning that prior assessments had indicated no significant strategic risks. He suggested that the primary concerns might stem from a desire to retain critical infrastructure within Australia, as well as the port’s proximity to US military installations frequently used by American marines in Darwin.
In summary, while Albanese aims to strengthen ties with China, the issue of the Port of Darwin’s lease to Landbridge remains a potential flashpoint, reflecting broader concerns about national security and international relations.