A woman described as “generally truthful,” who was groomed by Chris Dawson during her teenage years, may not be accurate about a key aspect of the sexual abuse conviction that he is currently appealing, according to judges. Dawson, aged 76, is contesting a conviction for the sexual abuse of a former student who later moved into his home. His sentence for this offence, which primarily aligns with his 24-year sentence for murdering his wife, Lynette Dawson, in January 1982, only added an additional year to his non-parole period.
During the appeal at the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, barrister Stephen Odgers SC raised significant questions regarding the credibility of evidence provided by the complainant, referred to as AB. Dawson has admitted to having sexual intercourse with AB but maintains that these actions occurred only after her 17th birthday, which is crucial to his defence.
The case centres around the timeline of events, including the first kiss shared between Dawson and AB during driving lessons and subsequent fitness classes conducted by Dawson and his twin brother. AB argues that the initial sexual encounter took place after these events but before her turning 17. Odgers stated that if the court finds sufficient discrepancies regarding the timing of the sexual acts, they should acquit Dawson, despite the judge deeming AB generally truthful.
Dawson silently observed the hearing from Silverwater prison, indicating his willingness to proceed. The 2023 District Court trial revealed Dawson had groomed AB through various activities, leading to a close relationship shortly after Lynette’s murder, when he subsequently disposed of her body.
Judge Sarah Huggett acknowledged inconsistencies in AB’s testimony but still convicted Dawson. Crown prosecutor Helen Roberts SC urged the appeals court to maintain the original ruling, citing compelling evidence of Dawson’s sexual activity with AB in 1980. This included affectionate notes Dawson wrote to AB on her 17th birthday and other controlling behaviours, suggesting a physical relationship existed prior to her turning 17.
The appeals court’s verdict is pending, while Dawson’s earlier appeal against his murder conviction was dismissed in June. He remains incarcerated, with his non-parole period for murder set to end in 2040.