Billy Slater, the new Queensland State of Origin coach, has made headlines by axing long-time captain Daly Cherry-Evans from the team, a move reminiscent of Paul Vautin’s controversial decisions nearly three decades ago. This bold tactic follows a disappointing opening game, in which Cherry-Evans struggled, raising questions about his continued selection despite his past contributions as a key player for Queensland.
Cherry-Evans’ removal not only reflects Slater’s willingness to make tough choices but also signifies a new direction for the Maroons, especially with the inclusion of Tom Dearden, who represents the future of the team. However, Slater’s decision carries risks, as history shows that similar drastic changes can backfire. Vautin made a parallel gamble after a losing game in 1996, resulting in a series loss against New South Wales after a desperate reshuffle that included dropping influential players like Trevor Gillmeister.
The upcoming match in Perth poses a critical juncture for Queensland, where they hope to even the series against the Blues, who currently hold the upper hand. Slater must now navigate the delicate balance between team loyalty and performance, as the Maroons traditionally pride themselves on steadfastness and resilience.
Reactions have been mixed, with rugby league great Mal Meninga expressing his shock at the decision, comparing its significance to past headline-making moments in the sport. Meanwhile, Blues coach Ricky Stuart took a dig at Queensland’s long-standing selection culture, suggesting Slater’s shake-up contradicts the team’s foundational principles of loyalty and consistency.
By choosing to drop Cherry-Evans, Slater has taken a significant risk that could lead to either a much-needed revival or deepened frustration for the Maroons. If successful, this bold move may solidify Slater’s legacy, yet if it falters, it could further complicate the already tense dynamics surrounding selection philosophy in Queensland rugby league. Ultimately, the performance in the upcoming game will determine whether Slater’s gamble pays off or becomes another cautionary tale in Origin history.