China’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, has issued a stark warning regarding the Albanese government’s intentions to reclaim control over the port of Darwin, warning that such actions could lead to significant diplomatic tensions between Australia and China. While visiting the port, Xiao described the government’s proposal to annul the lease held by the Chinese firm Landbridge as “ethically questionable.” He cautioned that if Canberra proceeds with this plan, it could sour relations, which would be detrimental for both countries.
Landbridge, which was awarded a 99-year lease on the port in 2015, should not be penalised for its investments, Xiao remarked. He expressed that the investment made by the Chinese company deserves recognition rather than punishment, especially since the port was not profitable at the time of the lease agreement. He further emphasised that the ethical dilemma arises from wanting to regain a publicly unprofitable asset only after it has turned profitable.
Xiao reiterated the importance of mutual trust between China and Australia, indicating that their strategic partnership should focus on fostering collaboration based on shared interests. He referenced the political backdrop of the upcoming decision, noting that both major parties had pledged during the recent election campaign to rescind the Landbridge lease and restore the port to Australian governance.
The ambassador’s visit and remarks highlight the deepening complexities of Australia-China relations, exacerbated by concerns over foreign investments and national security. He also urged both the federal and Northern Territory governments to establish a straightforward and transparent business environment conducive to Chinese enterprises operating within Australia, signalling a desire for constructive dialogue moving forward.
Overall, Xiao’s statements reflect a growing concern that the push for greater control over the port could have lasting negative implications for diplomatic relations, emphasising the need for careful consideration of the potential impacts on bilateral ties.