In Australia, an increasing number of individuals are turning to platforms like ChatGPT for guidance on their voting decisions, but experts are cautioning against this practice. They argue that relying on artificial intelligence (AI) for such significant choices can undermine the democratic process.
While some voters believe it is acceptable to consult AI for additional information, professionals in the field, such as Professor Mayowa Babalola from the University of Western Australia, assert that making decisions based solely on AI interactions is misguided. “If your decision is solely based on your interaction with AI, then you’re doing something that’s not right,” he warned. This sentiment is echoed by other voters, with one emphasising the importance of self-awareness when it comes to values and voting preferences.
By simply providing a chatbot with basic details like age, job title, and electorate, users can receive a list of candidates and tailored recommendations. However, this automated support is viewed with skepticism. Several political figures, including former Deputy Prime Minister Kim Beazley, have expressed their disapproval of using AI in voting contexts. Beazley described the practice as “undesirable,” advocating for a more personal connection to one’s voting decisions without intermediary technology. Additionally, WA Police Minister Paul Papalia highlighted the importance of self-education regarding candidates and their policies before making electoral choices.
Despite some voters finding AI tools helpful for gathering information, experts maintain that AI answers should not be taken at face value. They assert that critical thinking and personal engagement with the electoral process are essential. Professor Babalola cautioned against blindly trusting AI outputs, advocating for independent verification of information.
Overall, while technology can enhance access to information, experts urge Australian voters to remain vigilant and informed, ensuring that their voting decisions are grounded in personal values and judicious consideration rather than automated suggestions.